Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-14 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-14 House Journal Page 1657 HB 251 Representative Stoltze brought up reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 251(FIN) am (page 1609). The following was again before the House in third reading: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 251(FIN) am "An Act relating to exemption of certain foreign pleasure craft from the mandatory pilotage requirement and to civil fines imposed on the owner or operator of a pleasure craft of foreign registry; and providing for an effective date." Representative Stoltze moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 251(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall CSHB 251(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 251(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Return to Second/Rescind Previous Action/Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 22 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Harris, Heinze, Kerttula, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Rokeberg, Williams Excused: Croft, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Moses And so, CSHB 251(FIN) am was returned to second reading. 2003-05-14 House Journal Page 1658 Representative Stoltze moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1. Representative Berkowitz objected. The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 251(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Rescind Previous Action/Amendment No.1 YEAS: 27 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Harris, Hawker, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Guttenberg, Kott Excused: Croft, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Moses Absent: Crawford, Foster, Heinze, Morgan, Wolf And so, the motion passed. Amendment No. 1 (page 1565) was before the House. Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Stoltze: Delete "180" Insert "175" Representative Gara objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2003-05-14 House Journal Page 1659 CSHB 251(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 31 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Kerttula, Kohring, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Guttenberg, Kookesh, Kott Excused: Croft, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Moses And so, Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 251(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment No. 1 as amended YEAS: 33 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Kerttula, Kohring, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Kookesh, Kott Excused: Croft, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Moses And so, Amendment No. 1 as amended was adopted. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 251(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2003-05-14 House Journal Page 1660 CSHB 251(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 30 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Gara, McGuire, Stoltze, Weyhrauch Excused: Croft, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Moses And so, CSHB 251(FIN) am passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 251(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.